K1Data study
Christopher Flanagan, H. Grousbeck. (2002)
Stanford GSB Case E-120, 7 pp
Earliest edition available in the Stanford catalogue; the PDF is headed "VERSION: (A) JULY 24, 2001". Sample: "during the period from 1984 through 2000, at least 46 search funds were raised and at least 31 companies were acquired" (p3); 62 potential funds were screened down to 31 "qualified" first-time funds, and "return results were obtained for 28 of the 32 first-time search funds" (p1; the body on p4 to p6 says 31 qualified, 28 analysed). Excluded: funds that could not be reached or never raised a fund ("some of these did conduct self-funded searches, rather than investor-funded searches"), one fund that declined, four non-first-time funds, two industry roll-ups, five that became start-ups, three still searching, and acquisitions held under one year (p5 to p6). Headline: "the blended pre-tax IRR for individuals investing an equal amount in each of those funds was found to be 35.9% or 36.8%, depending on the method used to calculate terminal value" (p1); Table 1 (p7) gives median purchase price $6.5 M, median purchase price / EBITDA 5.2x, median purchase price / revenue 0.9x, and individual company IRR min (100)%, median 17.6%, max 98.3%. Method and limits: equal investment size and a common start date imposed on every fund; operating companies valued at purchase multiple or at an industry multiple less a 30% discount; company financials "in many cases ... not been audited"; "no individual data on companies is provided in this report" for confidentiality.
Source
K2Data study
H. Grousbeck, Mu Li. (2003)
Stanford GSB Case E-162, 11 pp
Dated June 24, 2003. Sample: "a total of 52 first-time search funds that agreed to participate"; of 51 completed funds, 13 still searching, 20 operating an acquisition, 18 "had either failed to make an acquisition, sold, or closed down their acquired firms"; return analysis covers 36 funds "that had either terminated or had been in operation for at least one year" (p1). Headline: "the blended pre-tax internal rates of return (IRRs) for individuals investing an equal amount in each of those funds was 33.4% or 34.7%" (p1); "about 39% of the funds ... resulting in complete or near complete loss of investor capital. Over half of these situations involved the failure of search funders to identify or execute an acquisition" (p7); Exhibit (p10) median purchase price $5.4 M, median purchase price / EBITDA 5.3x. Has an explicit section "Research Methodology and Potential Biases": selection bias "is limited to the selection bias of the 2001 study, where 46 out of a universe of 62 search funds elected to participate" (p4); excludes serial search funders and funds that became start-ups (p5); financials self-reported and often unaudited (p10).
Source
K3Data study
H. Grousbeck, Mike Harkey. (2005)
Stanford GSB Case E-215, 14 pp
Dated 12/23/05. Sample: "a total of 71 first-time search funds that agreed to participate"; 12 still searching, 26 operating, 33 "had failed to make an acquisition, sold, or closed down their acquired firms"; returns computed on 49 funds (p5). Headline: "the blended pre-tax internal rates of return (IRRs) for individuals investing an equal amount in each of those funds was 37.3 percent or 37.7 percent" (p1); "24 percent of all the search funds we studied failed to make an acquisition" (p3); "The median purchase price of acquisitions increased slightly from $5.4 million in 2003 to $5.7 million in 2005" (p6). Same exclusions as 2003 (serial searchers, start-ups, under 12 months of operation) and same terminal value conventions; a small number of funds disclosed only partial information.
Source
K4Data study
H. Grousbeck, Sean Harrington. (2008)
Stanford GSB Case E-282, 16 pp
Dated 01/15/2008; data "As of December 2007". Sample: "95 first-time search funds that agreed to participate"; 22 searching, 23 operating, 50 terminal; "Of the 50 terminal search funds, 34 percent concluded without an acquisition" (p4); returns on 61 funds (p5). Headline: "the blended IRR for a person investing an equal amount in each of the 61 search funds at the same start date to be 52 percent"; "When the three best performing search funds are removed from the calculations, the blended IRR is 37 percent, and when the top five firms are removed, the return drops to 16 percent" (p7 to p8); "18 percent of all the search funds we studied failed to make an acquisition" (p3); median purchase price $7.9 M all acquisitions and $9.4 M since 2005, median purchase price / EBITDA 4.9x (p6, p12 to p13). Limits stated: operating companies valued at the purchase multiple; later-round investors excluded; footnote 8: "We suspect that poorer performing search funds are more likely to opt out of the study."
Source
K5Data study
H. Grousbeck, Aimee LaFont Leifer, Tjarko Leifer, Lisa Sweeney. (2010)
Stanford GSB Case E-386, 17 pp
Dated 7/21/2010; data as of December 31, 2009. Sample: "129 known funds have raised search capital for the first time" (p1); 41 (32%) still searching, 69 (53%) acquired, 19 (15%) "ended their searches without making an acquisition" (p11); returns on 79 funds, with 50 not included (41 searching, 7 acquired within 12 months, 2 insufficient data) (p12). Survey mechanics are given: 154 searchers contacted, 115 completed Part 1 "representing 88 funds" (p9). Headline, and the first edition to report a multiple: "As an asset class, Search Funds have achieved a 13.5x multiple of investment and a 37.3% IRR. However, when the top three funds are excluded, the remainder of the asset class returned a 2.4x multiple of investment and a 20.2% IRR. When the top five funds are removed, the asset class multiple of investment and IRR drop to 1.9x and 19.0%" (p14); "The median fund returned only 0.5x (50%) of investors' capital, whereas the top-performing fund returned well over 200 times" (p14); "Of these 79 funds, 59% suffered a partial or complete loss of capital" (p13); median purchase price $8.0 M, purchase price / EBITDA 5.1x (p6 to p7). Method change: operating companies now valued at the principal's own estimate of enterprise value instead of the purchase multiple, and the asset-class IRR is now weighted "in proportion to the amount of capital raised by each fund" (p12); the study warns precise cash flow data are hard to obtain and asks readers to "take these limitations into account" (p13).
Source
K6Data study
H. Irving Grousbeck, Arar Han, Sara Rosenthal. (2012)
Stanford GSB Case E-446, 20 pp
Catalogue page opened; the PDF is restricted ("available for download by current Stanford GSB students, faculty, and staff, as well as Stanford GSB alumni"), so sample size and method were not read. The catalogue abstract states: "the aggregate pre-tax internal rate of return of the search fund asset class through year-end 2011 is 34.4 percent. The aggregate pre-tax return on invested capital is 11.1x." The same two figures are repeated in IESE ST-336-E (p8) and the 11.1x in Stanford E-521 (p11).
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K7Data study
David Dodson, Peter Kelly, H. Irving Grousbeck, Jason Luther, Sara Rosenthal. (2014)
Stanford GSB Case E-521, 28 pp
Dated 06/20/14; data as of December 31, 2013. Sample: "177 first-time search funds formed since 1983" (p5; this edition and 2016 say 1983, others 1984); 32 searching, 60 operating, 11 deviated or unknown, 74 terminal (22 exited, 17 acquired then shut down, 35 concluded without an acquisition) (p6); "Of the 134 funds eligible ... 117 were included in the calculations of returns" (p11). Headline: "As an asset class, search funds have achieved an ROI of 10.0x and an IRR of 34.9 percent. The median fund returned 1.0x of initial search fund investors' capital, whereas the top-performing fund returned well over 200x. ROI ... declined from 11.1x in 2011 to 10.0x in 2013" (p11); "twenty-six percent of all search funds that have reached conclusion have closed without making an acquisition"; acquisitions since the 2011 study "had a median purchase price of $11.6 million" (p10). Excludes repeat searchers; "known search funds" are those CES is aware of; returns use "data provided by the principals" and, for the 43 operating companies, "principals' estimates of market value" (p11).
Source
K8Data study
Peter Kelly, David Dodson, H. Irving Grousbeck, Susan Pohlmeyer, Sara Rosenthal. (2016)
Stanford GSB Case E-605, 31 pp
Dated 06/26/16; data as of December 31, 2015 (first edition named for publication year rather than data year). Sample: "258 first-time search funds formed since 1983" (p5); 75 searching, 47 concluded without acquisition, 8 deviated or unknown, 128 acquired (75 operating, 34 exited for a gain, 19 exited with a loss) (p7); "Of the 175 funds eligible ... 142 were included in the calculations of returns", being 47 unsuccessful searches and 95 acquisitions (p11 to p12). Headline: "the aggregate pre-tax internal rate of return ... through year-end 2015 is 36.7 percent, and the aggregate pre-tax return on invested capital is 8.4x" (p1); note p12 also says ROI "declined from 10.0x in 2013 to 8.3x in 2015". "historically 27 percent of all search funds (which does not include those that have deviated from the model) fold without making an acquisition"; acquisitions since 2013 "had a median purchase price of $12 million" (p10). Method changes: an original investor is now one who funded both search and acquisition, and "the performance calculation for this year's study excluded any follow-on financing events where possible" (p1, p11).
Source
K9Data study
Peter Kelly, H. Irving Grousbeck, Austin Yoder, Sara Rosenthal. (2018)
Stanford GSB Case E-662, 34 pp per catalogue (PDF is 18 two-up pages)
Dated September 24, 2018; data as of December 31, 2017. Sample: "325 first-time search funds formed since 1984", described as "all the known search funds in the United States and Canada except two that did not respond"; 86 searching, 6 deviated; "Of the funds no longer searching (233), 69 percent (160) had acquired a company and 31 percent (73) had ended their search without an acquisition"; 137 acquisitions in the financial analysis (7 excluded for insufficient data, 16 held under one year). First edition to state the exclusion outright: "we excluded funds led by principals who had previously raised a search fund, who self-funded their search, or who pursued their search with a single search sponsor". Headline: "search funds in aggregate provided an ROI of 6.9x and an IRR of 33.7 percent to investors. The median fund returned 1.0x"; median purchase price for 2016 and 2017 acquisitions $13.1 million, median purchase price / EBITDA 6.3x. Limits stated: follow-on financings and tax distributions excluded; earlier data "may have disproportionately represented companies with lower returns"; data through 2009 include international funds. (Two-column layout made page attribution unreliable in text extraction; all quotes are from PDF p1 to p6.)
Source
K10Data study
Peter Kelly, Sara Heston. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E-726, 32 pp
Dated August 13, 2020; data as of December 31, 2019. Sample: "401 first-time search funds formed since 1984"; 90 searching; "Of the 305 funds no longer searching, 101, or 33%, closed without making an acquisition. The remaining 204 searches successfully acquired companies" (p4); 186 in the financial analysis, "excluding 18 companies that had been operating for less than one year" (p3). Headline: "The aggregate pre-tax internal rate of return for investors was 32.6% through the end of 2019, down from 33.7% in the 2018 study, and the return on invested capital was 5.5x, down from 6.9x in 2018" (p2); "The IRR excluding the top 5 returns increased for the fifth study in a row, to 28.5%, while the ROI excluding the top 5 funds decreased slightly, from 3.0x to 2.9x" (p7); "In the current study, 67% of all searchers made an acquisition" (p8); median purchase price fell "from $13.1 million to $10 million", median EBITDA multiple 6.0x (p6). Same exclusions as 2018 (serial, self-funded, single sponsor; discussed only in Appendix C); claims data "from virtually every known search fund and acquisition" (p7).
Source
K11Data study
Peter Kelly, Sara Heston. (2022)
Stanford GSB Case E-807, 31 pp
Dated July 15, 2022; data as of December 31, 2021. Sample: "526 first-time search funds formed since 1984" (p3); data on 270 acquirers, of which "225 are included in our aggregate financial analysis, excluding 44 companies that had been operating for less than one year and one company for which we had incomplete financial information" (p3). Headline: "aggregate pre-tax returns of 35.3% internal rate of return (IRR) and 5.2x return on investment (ROI)" (p2); "Excluding those still searching, 66% of all search funds launched made an acquisition" (p4); "the median purchase price increased significantly to $16.5 million" (p2). Footnote 2 (p2) discloses a cap not stated in earlier editions: "all returns calculations cap the return from the highest returning search fund at 200x ROI". Excludes serial, self-funded and single-sponsor searches (p3); first edition to report searcher ethnicity.
Source
K12Data study
Peter Kelly, Sara Heston. (2024)
Stanford GSB Case E-870, 27 pp
Dated June 28, 2024; data as of December 31, 2023. Sample: "681 first-time search funds formed since 1984" (p4), now called "core search funds"; data on 328 acquirers, "296 are included in our aggregate financial analysis, excluding 29 companies that had been operating for less than one year and three companies for which we had incomplete financial information" (p4). Headline: "For all search funds, IRR was 35.1% and ROI was 4.5x as of December 31, 2023" (p7); "the IRR for companies that have exited increased to 42.9% from 36.8%" (p2); "Of those that concluded their search, 63% made acquisitions, a decrease from 66% in the 2022 study" (p4); "The median purchase price ... declined to $14.4 million in this study from $16.5 million in the prior report, representing a 7.0 multiple of EBITDA" (p2). Exclusions: serial, self-funded, single-investor searches, plus 22 Long Term Hold vehicles (seven of which had been in prior editions) (p4); p16 states "self-funded searches are the most numerous" of the alternative models and that Stanford "has not collected sufficient data" to report on them.
Source
K13Data study
Peter Kelly, Stefanos Zenios, Dom Ng. (2026)
Stanford GSB Case E-967, 30 pp
Latest edition, dated June 30, 2026; data through December 31, 2025. Sample: "862 core search funds launched since 1984, representing 99% of known search funds in the United States and Canada" (p1), defined as funds "led by a first-time search entrepreneur and funded in the search phase by multiple investors" (p2); 181 new qualifying funds confirmed from over 800 candidates; "we've captured updated outcomes for 97% of known search funds" (p2). Headline: "For all search funds, aggregate IRR was 33.9% and ROI was 4.75x as of December 31, 2025" (p7), versus 35.1% and 4.5x in 2024; exited funds "IRR was 39.3% and ROI 5.98x" (p8); "The overall acquisition rate for all search funds that have concluded stands at 58%. For funds that started between 2021-24 and concluded ... that rate was 48%" (p5); 2024-25 median purchase price $16.0M at 6.2x EBITDA (p6, Exhibit 4 p23). Concentration is quantified: "Returns excluding funds returning 10x ROI or greater: 2.8x ROI (versus 4.75x) and 27% IRR (versus 33.9%)" and "excluding the top 10% of funds by ROI: 2.1x ROI and 20% IRR" (p10); "of the 58% of concluded search funds that acquired, 74% reported some gain in value" (p11); adds a public market equivalent of 2.88 (p11) and first data on 67 long duration enterprises, for which no returns are calculated (p18). Limits stated: "Entrepreneurs self-report fund details, acquisitions, and outcomes"; trends are shown "without limiting our analysis to those that meet conventional thresholds of statistical significance" (p2); returns are "aggregate cash flows ... not an average of individual fund-level returns" (p7 fn 5); findings "may vary from the experience of an individual investor" (p3). Exhibit 12 (p29) lists the authors of every edition back to 1996.
Source
K14Data study
Peter Kelly, Sara Heston, Andrew Freiman. (2023)
Stanford GSB Case E-841, 9 pp
Dated 09/03/23. A one-off survey of executive hiring and firing in the first two years after acquisition: "Surveys were emailed to 60 CEOs; 40 responded" in April 2023 (p1). Findings: "83 percent hired at least one senior employee during the first two years post-acquisition and 68 percent had at least one senior employee leave"; respondents were "more likely to report that personnel decisions took place too late (49 percent) versus too soon (2 percent)"; "there was no clear correlation between the pace of hiring and departures and the return on investment (ROI) of the acquisition" (p1). Small, self-selected sample of search fund CEOs; no fund-level data.
Source
K15Case note
Peter Kelly, Sara Heston. (2024)
Stanford GSB Case "E870 Long Term Hold" (companion note to the 2024 study), 2 pp
Dated 6/28/2024. Defines Long Term Hold (LTH) as "a category of variations to the core search fund model", a subset of committed capital vehicles, typically with "a larger pool of committed capital ($15-$25M)", a narrow thesis, "a minimum 10 to 20 year time horizon", growth mainly by acquisition, and a board formed at the outset (p1). Definitional only; no outcome data. It explains why 22 such vehicles were removed from the 2024 study sample.
Source
K16Primer
Peter Kelly, Dom Ng, Kim Latypov, Julie Makinen. (2026)
Stanford GSB Case E-958, 69 pp
Current edition; the preface says it updates "the 2021 Primer" and "focuses on the core search fund model", and "does not attempt to catalog all model permutations" (p3). Structured in parts covering personal fit, fundraising, economics, industry and company criteria, the search, evaluating and closing an acquisition, boards, and transition; exhibits include legal templates from Goodwin Procter, Holland & Knight and Baker Hostetler; "Elad Benjamin created the original version" (p4). Repeats the 2024 study figures: "a historical average of 35.1 percent internal rate of return (IRR) and 4.5x multiple of investment as of 2023" (p4). Internal inconsistency worth noting: p4 says "roughly one in three search funds failed to acquire a company" while p11 says "Approximately two in five search funds end the search without acquiring a company". The landing page https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/experience/about/centers-institutes/ces/research/search-funds/primer asks for registration, but the catalogue page above offers a free download.
Source
K17Primer
Stanford GSB Center for Entrepreneurial Studies. (2015)
Third-party copy:
Copyright 2015 Stanford; acknowledgements credit William Norvell, Coley Andrews and David Dodson for the update and Elad Benjamin for the original version. Cites the 2013 study: "the 34.9 percent IRR and 10.0x multiple of investment for search funds as an asset class (as of 2013)". Says CES "conducted its first Search Fund Study at the end of 2001, it identified 46 first-time search funds", which conflicts with the 1996 start date given in every study. Do not cite a case number for this edition; none was read.
Source
K18Case study
William Barnett, Janet Feldstein. (2002)
Stanford GSB Case E-140A, 26 pp
Free download. Catalogue abstract: two 2001 Stanford GSB graduates, John Fowler and Josh Greenberg, found Montebello Capital, a search fund; "The case follows Montebello from formation until 2002, when the fund is fully subscribed and the full time search for a company is underway." PDF opened and header confirmed; body not read in detail.
Source
K19Case study
William Barnett, Brad Wolfe. (2004)
Stanford GSB Case E-140B, 35 pp
Free download; PDF dated 04/01/04. Catalogue abstract: continues the Fowler and Greenberg search after "almost one year of looking, and with their search funds dwindling". PDF opened and header confirmed; body not read in detail. The same protagonists reappear in Aero Logistics (E289, below).
Source
K20Case note
David Dodson, Susan Pohlmeyer. (2017)
Stanford GSB Case E629, 12 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K21Case note
David Dodson, Susan Pohlmeyer. (2017)
Stanford GSB Case E631, 10 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K22Case note
David Dodson. (2019)
Stanford GSB Case E677, 12 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K23Case note
David Dodson. (2019)
Stanford GSB Case E678, 5 pp
#### Case studies
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K24Case study
Harold Grousbeck, David Dodson. (1987)
Stanford GSB Case SB102
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K25Case study
Lauren Dutton, Jim Ellis, H. Grousbeck, Kevin Taweel. (1995)
Stanford GSB Case E21
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K26Case study
Harold Grousbeck, Brian Trelstad. (2000)
Stanford GSB Case E81
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K27Case study
Christopher Flanagan, Charles Holloway. (2002)
Stanford GSB Case E107
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K28Case study
Janet Feldstein, H. Grousbeck. (2003)
Stanford GSB Case E124, 13 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K29Case study
James Lattin, Mark Leslie, Erin Yurday. (2003)
Stanford GSB Case E163A
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K30Case study
H. Grousbeck, Alicia Seiger. (2003)
Stanford GSB Case E137
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K31Case study
Joel Peterson, Alicia Seiger. (2003)
Stanford GSB Case E164
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K32Case study
R. Ellis, Alicia Seiger. (2004)
Stanford GSB Case E168
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K33Case study
Mark Leslie, James Lattin, Joshua Spitzer. (2006)
Stanford GSB Case E209
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K34Case study
H. Grousbeck, Alex Tauber. (2006)
Stanford GSB Case E235
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K35Case study
R. Ellis, Sean Harrington. (2008)
Stanford GSB Case E289
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K36Case study
Katherine Bose, R. Ellis. (2008)
Stanford GSB Case E320
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K37Case study
H. Grousbeck, Claire Magat. (2009)
Stanford GSB Case E346
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K38Case study
R. Ellis, Lacey Wismer. (2009)
Stanford GSB Case E365
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K39Case study
H. Grousbeck, Claire Magat. (2010)
Stanford GSB Case E378
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K40Case study
H. Grousbeck, Arar Han. (2010)
Stanford GSB Case E390
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K41Case study
Bethany Coates, R. Ellis, Lisa Sweeney. (2010)
Stanford GSB Case E358
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K42Case study
Bethany Coates, R. Ellis, Lisa Sweeney. (2010)
Stanford GSB Case E362A
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K43Case study
Bethany Coates, R. Ellis, Lisa Sweeney, Anne Beyer. (2010)
Stanford GSB Case E362B
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K44Case study
Bethany Coates, R. Ellis, Lisa Sweeney. (2010)
Stanford GSB Case E362C
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K45Case study
Peter B. Kelly, Lacey Wismer. (2013)
Stanford GSB Case E450, 19 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K46Case study
Robert B. Chess, Austin Kiessig. (2013)
Stanford GSB Case E472, 23 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K47Case study
Jim Ellis, Justin Randolph. (2014)
Stanford GSB Case E484
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K48Case study
Jim Ellis, Jessica Morgan. (2015)
Stanford GSB Case E581, 13 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K49Case study
Jim Ellis, Matt Saucedo. (2017)
Stanford GSB Case E616, 23 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K50Case study
H. Irving Grousbeck, David Dodson, Erika Feldhausen. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E724, 7 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K51Case study
H. Irving Grousbeck, David Dodson, Jim Ellis, Erika Feldhausen. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E729, 3 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K52Case study
David Dodson, Mitchel Scott. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E730, 11 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K53Case study
Irving H Grousbeck. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E731, 5 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K54Case study
David Dodson, Scott Mitchel. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E734, 7 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K55Case study
David Dodson, Blake Kavanaugh. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E735, 12 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K56Case study
David Dodson, Blake Kavanaugh. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E736, 7 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K57Case study
David Dodson, Blake Kavanaugh. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E737, 8 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K58Case study
H. Irving Grousbeck, David Dodson, Erika Feldhausen. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E738, 5 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K59Case study
David Dodson, Imogen Mansfield. (2020)
Stanford GSB Case E742, 7 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K60Case study
H. Irving Grousbeck, Sara Rosenthal. (2022)
Stanford GSB Case E802, 4 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K61Case study
David Dodson, Gelila Bekele. (2022)
Stanford GSB Case E813, 8 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K62Case study
Julie Makinen, Peter Kelly. (2025)
Stanford GSB Case E936, 10 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K63Case study
Bryan Danielson, Garth Saloner. (2026)
Stanford GSB Case E960A, 28 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
K64Case study
Bryan Danielson, Garth Saloner. (2026)
Stanford GSB Case E960B, 23 pp
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)