O1Data study
Dennis, J., and Laseca, E. (2016)
University of Chicago Booth School of Business report, dated November 7, 2016 (Sponsor: Dr. Steven N. Kaplan; Advisor: Prof. Brian O'Connor)
Raw text, full 23-page PDF read. Landing page: https://polsky.uchicago.edu/2016/11/07/the-evolution-of-entrepreneurship-through-acquisition (opened; carries the same introduction paragraph and the November 7, 2016 date). This is the only Booth document with original data that I could find. It is a student-authored report that combines a descriptive overview of ETA models (traditional, sponsored, incubated, self-funded, crowdfunded) with a set of structured investor interviews and a three-period history (1983 to 1999, 2000 to 2012, 2013 to present).
Source
O2Other
Hodgkin, A. (2016)
Polsky Center @ UChicago (Medium), July 27, 2016
Raw text, full article read. A four-minute opinion piece by Alex Hodgkin, bylined "Senior Advisor on Entrepreneurship Through Acquisition and Polsky Center Entrepreneur in Residence". It sets out four reasons to self-fund (target flexibility and valuation, SBA 7(a) financing, control, better economics) and the main caveat (no committed investor base). No original data. It cites "a 2014 HBS study which polled 37 entrepreneurs who had engaged with intermediaries" and quotes a lender-services executive; neither is a Booth dataset.
Source
O3Other
Schonthal, D. (2023)
Kellogg Insight, May 12, 2023
Raw text, full article read. Opinion article by David Schonthal (page lists him as Clinical Professor of Strategy and Faculty Director of the Zell Fellows Program); the page states "This article originally appeared in Inc." It argues ETA counts as entrepreneurship, names three models (self-funded search, search fund, accelerator) and gives three cautions (culture, unglamorous targets, time on the ground). No data and no sources; it contains one unsourced claim: "for not much more than $60,000 in cash, you could buy a business with $1.5M million in EBITDA, thanks to SBA programs and others" (typo is in the original). Do not cite that figure as evidence.
Source
O4Case note
Bovard, T. (2016)
Columbia CaseWorks, Case ID 160409, January 14, 2016
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O5Case study
Bovard, T. (2016)
Columbia CaseWorks, Case ID 160411, May 31, 2016
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O6Case study
Bressman, W., King, G.J., and Swain, J. (2026)
Columbia CaseWorks, Case ID 270404, September 9, 2026
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O7Case study
Bressman, W., and King, G.J. (2026)
Columbia CaseWorks, Case ID 270405, September 16, 2026
#### Dartmouth Tuck
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O8Case note
Rozenrot, E., under the supervision of Wainwright, F. (2005)
Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Center for Private Equity and Entrepreneurship, Case # 5-0034, updated October 18, 2005
Raw text. The 10-page PDF was downloaded and read through the first six pages plus the exhibits. It is a primer for class discussion covering raising a fund, target screening criteria, the acquisition and financing, and managing the company. It contains no original data: every statistic is footnoted to Stanford material, for example "A 2003 study conducted at Stanford found that first-time search funds produced pre-tax annualized returns of 32%", and the exhibits (searcher profiles and aggregate metrics, pre-2001 versus post-2001; deal structures for deals closed 1997 to 2003) are sourced to "Search Funds - 2003: What Has Changed Since 2001?, Stanford website". Dated; useful only as evidence of how the model was taught in 2005.
Source
O9Case study
Bruner, R.F. (2000)
Darden Business Publishing, F-1277, published January 11, 2000, 44 pages
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O10Case study
Fairchild, G.B., and Yemen, G. (2001)
Darden Business Publishing, ENT-0013, published August 16, 2001, 25 pages
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O11Case note
Alexander, L., and Madanha, A. (2025)
Darden Business Publishing, Technical Note ENT-0243, published December 8, 2025, 37 pages
#### IMD (not on the original checklist; turned up in searches)
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O12Case study
Leleux, B.F. (2026)
IMD, Reference IMD-7-2513, 14 pages
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O13Case study
Leleux, B.F., Kovacs, J., Rouiller, K., Braun, S., and Meouchi, T. (2024)
IMD, Reference IMD-7-2514, November 2024, 16 pages
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O14Case study
Leleux, B.F., Hanslin, D., Mordacheva, I., Rey, M., and Schuster, F. (2024)
IMD, Reference IMD-7-2515, November 2024, 17 pages
#### London Business School (LBS Publishing)
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O15Case study
Willey, K. (2018)
London Business School, LBS Case Code CS-18-021, January 2018, 13 pages
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O16Case study
Alemany, L., and Vasvari, F. (2023)
London Business School, LBS Case Code CS-23-003, May 2023, 10 pages
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O17Case study
Webster, S. (2023)
London Business School, LBS Case Code CS-22-019, October 2023, 16 pages
#### INSEAD
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O18Case note
Carrick, A.-M., and Bovard, T. (2011)
INSEAD, Reference 5789, published 25 May 2011, 15 pages
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O19Case study
Leleux, B., and Muzyka, D. (1995)
INSEAD, Reference 4450, published 31 Dec 1995, 22 pages
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O20Case study
Zoumpoulis, S., Naumovska, I., and Gready, A. (2026)
INSEAD, Reference 7050, published 19 Jun 2026
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)
O21Other
Naumovska, I., and Irarrázaval Zañartu, G. (2025)
INSEAD Knowledge, 12 June 2025
Fetch summary, opened twice (a second URL, https://knowledge.insead.edu/entrepreneurship/why-search-funds-are-outperforming-vc-and-pe, returned the same article). No original data: the only sourced statistic is from the IESE international study ("in 2023 alone, 59 new international search funds were created and 31 companies were acquired outside North America"). An INSEAD-specific claim appears without a source: "MBA graduates launched over 40 funds, many of them in new regions, in the past five years." The outperformance claim in the title rests on investor quotes and two chart images, not on figures in the text. Do not cite as evidence of returns.
Source
O22Case study
Thornhill, S., and Rosenberg, T. (2009)
Ivey Publishing, Product Number 9B09M006, 2009-01-07, 6 pages
#### Schools checked with no ETA publications found
Existence verified against the publisher's catalogue; content not read.
SourceVERIFIED (existence only)